\u201cThe Fine-Tuning Argument: For God or Against Physics?\u201d
\nBy Tufan K\u0131ymaz (Bilkent, Philosophy)<\/p>\n
Date: Thursday 9th November, 2017
\nTime: 15:40-17:15
\nPlace: H-232<\/p>\n
Abstract: The physical constants and laws of nature in our universe appear to be finely-tuned to secure the emergence of life. The best explanation of this appearance of fine-tuning for life is that the physical constants and laws of nature are in fact finely-tuned, that is, they are designed. Therefore, the finely-tuned appearance of our universe constitutes good (if not conclusive) evidence for the existence of God. This is the Fine-Tuning Argument and it is arguably the most influential argument for the existence of God in contemporary philosophy of religion. But, it is a bad argument, or so I argue. In this talk, I propose a counter-argument, which follows the same inferential approach that underlies the Fine-Tuning Argument, to a conclusion that is incompatible with its soundness. I argue, more specifically, that one can use the same kind of consideration that the Fine-Tuning Argument rests on to argue not for the existence of God but against the reliability of our current fundamental physics. This poses a serious problem for the Fine-Tuning Argument since it is essential for the argument that our current fundamental physics is reliable.<\/p>\n
Web: www.phil.bilkent.edu.tr
\nFacebook: www.facebook.com\/bilkent.philosophy<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cThe Fine-Tuning Argument: For God or Against Physics?\u201d By Tufan K\u0131ymaz (Bilkent, Philosophy) Date: Thursday 9th November, 2017 Time: 15:40-17:15 Place: H-232 Abstract: The physical constants and laws of nature in our universe appear to be finely-tuned to secure the emergence of life. The best explanation of this appearance of [\u2026] <\/p>\n